I defend the posture "interculturalism and dialogue" because I see the linguistic diversity as an enriching thing.
More than enriching languages are types of identity.
Religions, the color of the skin among others are also types of identity . People need an identity but the problem is that religion or the color of the skin bring conflicts and in fact have had throughout the history the cause of lot of wars.
For this reason I defend the linguistic diversity like a passive identity. Plus you can have more than one language so more than one indentity. With religion or the skin's color you can't.
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada