diumenge, 20 de març del 2016

Charlotte Rampling says oscar boycoctt is racism against white

The point of view of Charlotte Rampling is that all of us are differend but some people have historically been ejected from certain community. Basically, here it's a problem of skin color.

In fact we would never really know how the Academy makes its decisions. That's why so many minority performers still feel that they lack the recognition they deserve.

In one way, Mr Lee Later's suggestion for more transparency is legitimating the selection. He wants to institute a policy similar than the NFL'D requirement that teams interview minority candidates for head coach and senior staff jobs.

To conclude if you can't impose a find choice to the jury, the competition could be more equitable and the members of the jury could be, at least, forced to evaluate all candidates in the same way.
 
 

News :
 
Hundreds of thousands of Brazilians have been taking to the streets to protest against their government, as a gathering corruption scandal threatened to engulf the president and her predecessor. President Rousself appointed Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva as her chief of staff, in what was widely seen by her critics as an attempt to shield him from prosecution over alleged corruption and money-laundering. Hours after Lula’s appointment, a number of secretly taped phone calls between Lula and Rousseff were released, which appeared to suggest that the job offer had indeed been made to protect Lula. 
 
Heavily bitter elite opposition staging a coup to seize power of a democratically elected president. If the guardian are offering us only a one sided cover on this story, there only two things that comes into my mind, bad journalism or bad intentions.
Remember, the party driving the coup current government as it is cracking down heavily on the vital arteries of well established corrupt deal with international companies, that in turn, would benefit exploring and securing Brazil’s abundant natural resources.
 

Promise at Down (Book)

La promesse de l'aube
Summary:

This book has been written by Romain Gary, a french author. It's an autobiography witch particularly treats about his special relation with one of the most important person of men's life this mother.
 
She was courageous and  and incredibly confident about his son's successful future. She wasn't only hopping the best for him but made all the possible for this result could happened.
 
Even after her death (3 years before of the end of the 2nd WW) she continues to support him. He knows what she was expecting for him and he struggles to become like she hopes and expected.

Opinion:

I did choose this book because the tittle is full of hope. Indeed, the author believe in humanity and never abandoned his idealistic hope for the future. Nor during the war, neither during the worst moment in his life he never feel lost.
 
During the lecture I was smiling because the ton was ironic even in the most dramatic situation. I recognized myself in many scenes and I imagined what I would have done if I was at his place.


Their judgement or yours :


Why feel judge by others ? Why be convinced to know what the others think about you ?

I think we do not realize that no one thing equal, that no one live in the same way the moments, no one is equal. 

I only can say that the opinion you thing people have on you is the reflect of your own opinion on you. 

Why ? If we can not know the think of others the presume judge they have on you is a result of an attitude or something you wear that make you think this. At the end is your own opinion but the one you do not want to accept, but you know it.

Is every one créatif ?

Well we have to know that brain interpret the reality in function of the information that arrive to it. Thence the brain decide what is more important.

For example, if you imagine a circle: the contour will have more importance than the interior or if you imagine a triangle: the angle will have more importance than the right line. Why? Because they contain more information. And if information do not arrive to the brain this one gone a create or imagine what there might be.
This capacity of the brain for invent the reality is creativity so the human is créatif !

In fact for my opinion, with the reason we can not discover everything.

So every body are créatif but there is always some more than others.

Die and not feel pain or feel pain and probably die :

If humans would not need to give a sense to their live therefore be insignificant, they do not suffer. It would not exist pain, and die would not affect us. It make me think to this sentence: nobody will miss me if I die.
Just giving importance to something or somebody if this thing or person disappear, disappoint you... in this case you will fill certainly pain.

Only problem is that humans wants to give a sense to his life. Be someone in the life. This reason bring us to feel pain and be afraid to die but it also make us feel happy, in love and make us feel a lot of different feelings.

The positivity of linguistic diversity

I defend the posture "interculturalism and dialogue" because I see the linguistic diversity as an enriching thing.

More than enriching languages are types of identity.

Religions, the color of the skin among others are also types of identity . People need an identity but the problem is that religion or the color of the skin bring conflicts and in fact have had throughout the history the cause of lot of wars.

For this reason I defend the linguistic diversity like a passive identity. Plus you can have more than one language so more than one indentity. With religion or the skin's color you can't.